点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
春运期间预计进出京旅客总量达2536万人次 探亲流是主体******
中新网北京1月7日电 (杜燕 徐婧)2023年春运从2023年1月7日(腊月十六)开始至2月15日(正月二十五)结束，共计40天。北京市交通委今天表示，今年，春运处于疫情防控优化调整转段期，预计出行需求将得到释放。据预测，铁路、民航、省际客运进出京总量2536万人次，日均63万人次；高速公路日均180万辆次。
务工、学生流呈现错峰分批特征
北京市交通委表示，今年，受疫情影响，务工、学生流呈现错峰分批特征，春运前陆续离京返乡，春运后开始返校返岗。旅游流受疫情感染期影响恢复有限。探亲流仍是主体，预计在春节假期前开始陆续出京，节后集中返京。
北京市交通委表示，预计节前2-3天将迎来出京客流高峰，正月初七、正月十五前后迎来两个返京客流高峰，进出京客运量达80万人次。高速公路交通量高峰出现在2月10日，达205万辆次。
北京市交通委指出，总体来说，春节前后交通呈现快速恢复性增长趋势。北京将对交通发展趋势持续开展实时监测和分析研判，及时发布出行提示信息，提前做好运力准备等保障工作。
旅客在北京西站乘坐春运首日北京首趟始发列车G6701次列车。 中新社记者 贾天勇 摄不查验乘客核酸阴性证明和健康码
北京市交通委表示，北京严格落实疫情防控优化调整各项措施，认真实施铁路、公路、民航、邮政快递等领域疫情防控政策。不再对乘客查验核酸检测阴性证明和健康码，不再开展落地检，不再实施乘客测温。有序恢复已暂停的客运服务。做好从业人员防护和场站、交通运输工具防疫管理。
同时，倡导乘客做自己健康的第一责任人，旅行途中全程戴口罩，主动减少聚集，出现发热等症状时避免乘坐公共交通工具。
加强运输服务和客运组织保障便捷出行
北京市交通委表示，将保障市内交通运行平稳。
公路方面继续实施春节假日高速公路免费通行政策。在进出京高峰期间，增加收费站现场保障力量，对车流量大的站口加强应急值守，结合交通量情况，合理配置车道，加强人员疏导。
省际客运方面，做好运力筹措，根据客流及时调整运营计划，动态优化运力调配。
轨道交通高峰时段加强站台、换乘通道楼、扶梯等重点部位监控，做好携带大包乘客的引导。针对返京高峰火车站、机场可能出现大客流的情况，做好4号线、7号线等重点接驳线路夜间延时运营保障的准备。
地面公交增加途经交通枢纽公交线路运营班次，强化运力供给。加强火车站、公园景区、商场及周边公交线路和站台的调度指挥和客流疏导，保障运营秩序。出租汽车做好机场、火车站和主要客流集散地的运力保障，加强与调度站、保点出租企业、交通台、调度中心联动，组织站区周边空驶车辆前往运营。
强化货运服务，做好保通保畅。春节“免通”期间继续实行大型车辆与7座以下客车通道分流，各收费站加强疏堵保畅、提升通行效率，共开辟333条绿通车道，保障绿通车快速查验、快速过站。强化服务区和收费站服务，高速服务区每日做好环境清洁消毒和通风换气，继续为货车司乘人员提供专区停靠、免费开水、餐饮售卖等服务。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)